On September 22nd, world leaders met at the UN Headquarters in New York City. The result was the adoption of the “Pact for the Future,” which lays the final pieces for their “New World Order.”
The “Pact for the Future” is a 56-page document that our leaders just committed us to. The centerpiece of this agreement is designed to “steer humanity on a new course.” This is a global agenda that literally covers just about every aspect of daily life. The UN describes the Pact as a “landmark declaration” pledging action towards an improved world for tomorrow’s generations. The agreement adopted by 193 members includes a pledge to move faster towards achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement commitments on climate change.
Seven Countries Oppose
This game-changing “Pact for the Future” was overwhelmingly approved except for a small group of seven countries that tried but failed to pass a last-minute amendment. Why was there opposition, and who opposed it? Russia, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Syria, and Nicaragua introduced a last-minute amendment to the draft, which revolved around the role of external entities having a say in their domestic affairs. In short, these countries do not want outside influences dictating what they have to do inside their borders. With their amendment failing, Russia responded by saying they would “distance themselves from this document.”
You would think an agreement of this magnitude would be the lead on every news broadcast and headline across the globe. However, this news was pretty much ignored by the Mainstream Media, especially here in the West. Most people I have asked have never heard of the “Pact for the Future,” which is interesting because, with this lack of knowledge, there was very little concern about whether or not we should commit to an agenda that lays the foundation for a “New World Order.” […]
— Read More: harbingersdaily.com
