Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff has become a symbol of the fight for free speech in Europe. Known for her unwavering stance on the dangers posed by Islam to the West, she faced persecution not just from the Austrian government but from the European Court of Human Rights, all for merely asking an uncomfortable yet factual question in a private class she taught. Her conviction raises serious concerns about the future of free expression and the increasingly oppressive landscape created by political correctness.
In one of her classes, Elisabeth brought up a historical fact: Mohammad, the founder of Islam, married a six-year-old girl, Aisha, and consummated that marriage when she was nine. She then posed a question to her students: “What would we call such a man in the West?” It was an honest and valid inquiry, yet it led to her being targeted by a leftist newspaper, which sent a spy to her class in an effort to silence her through cancel culture.
The courts of Austria, rather than protecting her right to free speech, twisted the situation against her. In a particularly bizarre ruling, a female judge argued that since Mohammad remained married to Aisha past the age of puberty, he could not be labeled a pedophile. This, despite the fact that Elisabeth never explicitly made that claim—she simply asked her class a question based on historical facts. Her appeal was consistently rejected by higher courts, and the case made its way to the European Union Commission of Human Rights, where, once again, her voice was stifled.
Elisabeth’s ordeal is part of a larger pattern, where truth is increasingly branded as hate speech by globalist entities like the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe), which aims to suppress free speech under the guise of protecting harmony. The OSCE, comprised of 57 participating states, is pivotal in shaping legislation that impacts free speech across Europe. […]
— Read More: rairfoundation.com
