Retired U.S. Navy Captain James Fanell criticized retired General Mark Milley, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, for his post-retirement comments on former President Trump. Fanell argued that Milley’s actions breach military ethics and highlight concerning trends in the politicization of the U.S. military.
Criticism of Milley’s Comments on Trump
James Fanell, a retired Navy Captain and former senior intelligence officer, strongly criticized General Mark Milley’s recent public remarks about Donald Trump. Milley, who had previously served as the top U.S. military officer, described Trump as a potential threat to the nation, even suggesting he exhibited traits of a “fascist.” Fanell viewed Milley’s statements as a violation of the ethical standards expected of former military leaders.
Fanell noted, “These kinds of acts call into question the oath they took—defending against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” He argued that Milley’s remarks undermine the core constitutional principle of civilian control over the military. If Milley had legitimate concerns about Trump’s fitness as Commander-in-Chief, Fanell suggested he should have addressed them privately while still in office.
A Breach of Military Ethics?
Fanell emphasized that General Milley’s role as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was advisory, not operational. As an advisor to the President, Milley’s duty was to offer counsel, not to criticize a sitting or former President post-service publicly. “Milley’s comments show contempt for the office of the presidency,” Fanell remarked, highlighting how this contradicts the military’s tradition of non-partisanship.
Comparisons to Historical Figures: A Loss of Professionalism
Fanell compared General Milley’s behavior to historical military figures who maintained neutrality, even under pressure. He referenced General George Marshall, a former Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, who famously abstained from voting to avoid any appearance of political bias. According to Fanell, Milley’s recent remarks signal a worrying shift in the conduct of senior military officials, moving away from professionalism.
“Milley’s actions are unprecedented,” Fanell stated. He believes that such actions harm the reputation of the U.S. military as a politically neutral institution. Fanell argued that if Milley felt strongly against Trump’s leadership, he should have resigned during his tenure rather than airing grievances years later. […]
— Read More: warroom.org
