NEW: Per ICE sources, the man seen in a viral video being subdued by residents & arrested by police w/ a blowtorch near the #KennethFire in West Hills is an illegal alien from Mexico named Juan Manuel Sierra-Leyva. He is in custody on a probation violation & has NOT been charged…

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) January 13, 2025

Despite the circumstances, Sierra-Leyva has not been charged with arson but is currently in custody for violating his probation.

The incident unfolded when Los Angeles police were dispatched to the 21700 block of Ybarra Road in Woodland Hills following a 911 call reporting someone attempting to start a fire. Shortly after, a fire broke out near Calabasas and West Hills, leading to Sierra-Leyva’s apprehension by local residents.

BREAKING: The man arrested with a blowtorch near the Kenneth Fire in the West Hills of California is an illegal immigrant from Mexico and ICE has placed a detainer request on him, according to @BillMelugin_ .

Juan Manuel Sierra-Leyva was NOT charged with arson and is “in… pic.twitter.com/6LEcsPrqJf

— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) January 13, 2025

Posts on X have highlighted the event, noting that while ICE intends to place a detainer on Sierra-Leyva, the effectiveness of this measure might be compromised due to sanctuary laws in California.

Note on ICE detainer… “they do not expect it to be honored due to California's Sanctuary State law”

Insanity. @RealTomHoman https://t.co/fYhdAUVCrJ

— Chip Roy (@chiproytx) January 13, 2025

This situation has sparked discussions on social media, with some users expressing frustration over the legal system’s handling of the case, particularly focusing on the lack of arson charges despite the presence of incriminating evidence like a blowtorch at the scene of a wildfire.

In most states, the evidence would be enough to charge him for arson. In California, it seems more and more likely that he’ll be released to roam about the country, blowtorch and all.

Under this new mandate, restaurants using char broilers would need to drastically reduce the smoky particulate matter they emit, or they might face closure. This proposal comes as part of broader efforts to improve air quality in New York City, focusing on reducing pollutants from sources like restaurant exhaust systems.

Restaurateurs are voicing their frustrations, with some like an unnamed restaurant owner who has been in the business for nearly 75 years, calling the rule “absolutely ridiculous.” He emphasized that the government should focus on more pressing quality of life issues rather than “messing with my burgers.”

This sentiment seems widespread among those affected by the regulation, who argue that the rule could fundamentally alter or even end their traditional cooking methods.

Exclusive: NYC restaurants burning up over new 'char broil' rule that would force them to cut emissions by 75% https://t.co/mjl3nwdiuW pic.twitter.com/iJOABr8Pjf

— New York Post (@nypost) January 12, 2025

The backlash is not just verbal; social media has been abuzz with posts from various users and restaurant advocates decrying the regulation. One user on X highlighted the absurdity of the proposed rule, while another expressed frustration over what they perceive as overreach by environmental regulators. These posts reflect a broader sentiment of resistance against what many see as an impractical mandate in the culinary world of NYC.

However, supporters of the rule argue that reducing emissions from char broilers is crucial for public health, especially in densely populated urban areas like New York City. They contend that the environmental benefits, including reduced health risks from air pollution, outweigh the costs to individual businesses, suggesting that restaurants adapt by using alternative, less polluting cooking methods or upgrading their existing equipment to meet the new standards.

The debate continues with no clear resolution in sight. Restaurant owners are left pondering the feasibility of compliance, while environmental groups push for immediate action on air quality. The New York City Department of Environmental Protection has yet to provide detailed guidance on how restaurants can achieve the required emissions reduction, leaving many in the industry in limbo.

STOP THE INSANITY!!! NYC restaurants flip out over new ‘char broil’ rule that would force them to cut emissions by 75%https://t.co/vVsTTaSc3N

— Triggering Liberal Tears (@nick9218) January 12, 2025

As this issue unfolds, it will be pivotal to see how the city navigates between supporting its vibrant food scene and enforcing environmental regulations. The outcome could set a precedent for urban dining and environmental policy not just in NYC but in cities worldwide grappling with similar issues.

Article generated from legacy media reports.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has been under fire for approving lavish contracts for city employees just months before the catastrophic wildfires that have ravaged the city. According to city records, these contracts, which significantly boosted the wages of civilian workers, directly contributed to the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) facing severe budget cuts, impacting its wildfire response capabilities.

Mayor Bass, who has been in office since 2022, signed off on contracts that saw civilian employees receiving between 20% to 25% salary increases over five years. The financial implications of these deals are estimated to cost the city around $4.5 billion over the contracts’ lifetime. This fiscal commitment led to a $17.6 million reduction in the LAFD’s budget for the 2024-2025 fiscal year, a decision that has now come under scrutiny as the city battles several devastating fires.

The Palisades Fire, which has become one of the most destructive in LA’s history, alongside the Eaton Fire, have caused widespread destruction, with thousands of structures burned and at least 16 lives lost. The reduced funding for the fire department meant fewer resources for training, equipment maintenance, and emergency response, at a time when the city was most vulnerable to such natural disasters.

Criticism has been mounting against Mayor Bass, with public figures and residents questioning the timing and prioritization of city spending. Firefighters have voiced concerns about the cuts’ impact on their readiness and effectiveness, particularly in light of the current disaster. The budget reduction has been described as “devastating” by some within the department, highlighting a significant shortfall in preparing for and responding to wildfires.

Public sentiment, as reflected in posts on X, shows a mix of frustration and disbelief over the allocation of funds towards city contracts while critical emergency services like the fire department faced cuts. The narrative on social media and in local news has been one of questioning leadership decisions at a time when the city’s safety and infrastructure were at stake.

Mayor Bass, upon returning from an international trip amidst the fires, has been largely silent on these specific decisions, focusing instead on the immediate response to the crisis. However, the controversy surrounding her financial choices has not abated, with many calling for a reevaluation of budget priorities to ensure better preparedness for future emergencies.

This situation underscores a broader debate on how cities manage their budgets, especially in areas prone to natural disasters like wildfires, where every dollar can mean the difference between life and death, or property saved versus destroyed.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

In an interview on the liberal podcast “Pod Save America,” Newsom acknowledged the anger among those affected by the wildfires but highlighted that he has been struggling to get clear information from local authorities. He stated, “I’m the governor of California and want to know the answer,” pointing out his own team’s inquiries into what went wrong have been met with vague responses.

He said, “I’ll be candid with you, I wasn’t getting straight answers,” regarding his discussions with local leaders, which he suggests has hindered effective response efforts. Newsom has given these local leaders “a little bit of grace,” recognizing they are dealing with an “emergency environment,” but also noted that patience among the public is running thin.

The governor also took aim at Trump, with whom he has had previous confrontations, especially after Trump criticized Newsom’s leadership during the wildfires. Trump accused Newsom of poor management, stating, “It’s very sad because I’ve been trying to get Gavin Newsom to allow water to come – you’d have tremendous water up there, they send it out from the Pacific – because they’re trying to protect a tiny little fish.”

Trump’s comments refer to environmental policies aimed at protecting certain fish species, which he claims have led to water mismanagement during the crisis.

In response, Newsom’s office clarified that high water demand and ongoing fires have impacted water supply logistics, explaining that pump stations at lower elevations lacked sufficient pressure to refill higher elevation tanks, and fire conditions made it difficult for crews to access these pumps.

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump’s transition team, sharply criticized Newsom, suggesting he focus on his gubernatorial duties rather than deflecting blame, saying, “Instead of appearing on liberal podcasts, maybe Newscum [sic] should be doing his f—ing job and actually help people who continue to suffer under his terrible leadership.”

Newsom sees the writing on the wall. The people are seeing through the failed leadership that has plagued California for decades and he’s trying to position himself as one of the victims. Los Angeles officials did it. Trump did it. He’ll do and say anything other than accept responsibilities for his role in the unmitigated disaster.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

UPDATE: Mayor Bass’ office is now saying she did not fire Kristin Crowley pic.twitter.com/3tdzrRWfkO

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) January 11, 2025

Original Story: (Discern Report)—Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley was dismissed by Mayor Karen Bass on Friday shortly after she publicly criticized city leadership for insufficient funding of the fire department. The decision to fire Crowley came hours after she gave an interview to Fox LA where she highlighted the severe impact of a $17.6 million budget cut on the department’s emergency response capabilities, particularly in the context of preparing for large-scale events like wildfires.

Crowley had previously sent a memo to Mayor Bass on December 4, warning that the budget cuts would limit the department’s capacity to train for and respond to emergencies. Her public statements included a direct critique of the city’s failure to match the fire department’s growth with the city’s expansion, pointing out that despite the doubling of LA’s population since 1960, the number of fire stations has not kept pace.

The firing has sparked discussions regarding the prioritization of funding in public safety, especially as California faces increasing threats from wildfires. Critics argue that the budget cuts, pushed through by Mayor Bass, might have compromised the city’s ability to manage these threats effectively.

This incident has also highlighted broader issues of leadership and accountability in emergency services management, with Crowley’s dismissal seen by some as a response to her outspokenness rather than a reflection of her performance. The situation has left the Los Angeles community questioning the city’s preparedness for future crises, given the substantial cuts to the fire department’s operational budget.

Here’s the discussion earlier about Crowley’s statement:

Article generated from corporate media reports.

Elon Musk, who is set to co-head the newly formed Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE), has moderated his earlier pledge to cut the federal budget by $2 trillion. In a recent conversation with former Clinton pollster Mark Penn on X, Musk acknowledged that achieving even half that amount would be an “epic outcome.” This adjustment indicates a recognition of the practical challenges in achieving such dramatic fiscal goals, aligning more with expert critiques of his original proposal’s feasibility.

Bill Ford of Ford Motor Company provided insights into Trump’s understanding of the industry. After a lengthy conversation with Trump, Ford expressed optimism about the incoming administration’s grasp of the competitive landscape, particularly concerning the threat from heavily subsidized Chinese automakers. Ford emphasized that affordability, rather than just technological parity, will be crucial in competing with these rivals.

Moreover, Ford isn’t worried about Tesla, led by Musk, gaining an unfair advantage through its relationship with Trump. He believes that Ford will have a voice in policy discussions, suggesting a collaborative rather than competitive stance between American automakers in this new political climate.

Musk’s involvement in government efficiency suggests a push towards deregulation, potentially benefiting Tesla through the reduction of red tape, although this might conflict with Tesla’s financial interests in regulatory credits from other manufacturers.

The political landscape has also seen Musk extend his influence internationally. His critiques of European leaders and support for far-right movements in countries like Germany have stirred controversy, reflecting his significant sway in both domestic and international politics.

As we move into 2025, the interplay between Trump, Musk, and Ford will be pivotal in shaping the future of the American auto industry, balancing between innovation, economic policy, and international trade dynamics.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

Los Angeles County residents were thrown into disarray on Thursday night when they received an erroneous evacuation alert. The warning, intended for those near the Kenneth Fire in Woodland Hills, was mistakenly broadcast to millions across the county, urging them to gather loved ones, pets, and supplies and evacuate their homes.

The panic was palpable as residents, like Thomas Jenkins from Downtown LA, began preparing to leave their homes only to learn moments later that the alert was a mistake. “I immediately jumped up and started packing my things even though I live Downtown,” Jenkins shared with The Post, expressing frustration over the unnecessary alarm. “It was irresponsible, annoying and caused panic for nothing.”

Social media platforms, including X, were flooded with reactions from confused and angry residents. One anonymous user described the ordeal of their neighbor, who was left frantic and in a panic. Another user criticized the handling of the situation as a “complete and utter failure” and highlighted the added stress to those already dealing with the ongoing wildfires.

The evacuation alert was meant for a specific area where the Kenneth Fire was actively burning, but a technical error led to the countywide dissemination. Kevin McGowan, Director of the Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Management, acknowledged the mishap, stating, “An evacuation order for residents near the Kenneth Fire currently burning in West Hills was mistakenly issued to nearly 10 million County residents along with some residents of neighboring counties.”

County Supervisor Janice Hahn was quick to clarify the error on social media, informing the public that the evacuation warning was mistakenly issued countywide due to a technical glitch. She assured that a correction would follow.

This incident has brought the reliability of emergency alert systems into question, especially given the backdrop of multiple wildfires currently devastating the region. The Palisades Fire, among others, is reported as the most destructive in the county’s history, with containment efforts still at 0%.

Residents and officials are now calling for improvements in communication and emergency management to prevent such errors in the future, as the city continues to battle the natural calamity alongside the fallout from this significant communication blunder.

When the Flames Came Close

Woods described watching the fire reach the edge of his property, a scene captured in a video he posted online. His neighbor, Robert Trenteller, risked his life to fight the fire near Woods’ deck before evacuating himself. This selfless act exemplified the essence of neighborly care during a crisis. Despite these efforts, Woods confirmed his house may have been severely damaged, though an official assessment hadn’t yet been completed at the time.

Woods emphasized how neighbors became lifelines for one another. Boundaries of wealth, political affiliation, or social status dissolved as everyone stood shoulder to shoulder, focused solely on survival. This crisis showcased that, ultimately, we are all human, deeply reliant on each other.

A Rescue Effort that Almost Failed

One particularly harrowing moment involved an elderly neighbor, a 94-year-old man with advanced dementia. His son, unaware of the fire’s proximity, mistakenly assumed his father was in the hospital rather than at home. Once Woods realized the man was still inside the house, he and others acted quickly to contact emergency services.

It took time to get through, but firefighters eventually rescued the man and his caregiver. The house burned down just an hour later. This narrow escape underscores the chaos and confusion that often accompany natural disasters and highlights the critical need for clear communication and preparedness during emergencies.

The Problem of No Water

A shocking realization during the fire was the lack of water in the area, leaving fire hydrants completely dry. Woods recounted the frustration of seeing fire trucks unable to operate due to empty reservoirs. He criticized state leadership, pointing out the failure to maintain essential fire prevention infrastructure.

California, known for its high taxes, should have the resources to support its residents in moments of crisis. Yet, as Woods noted, budget cuts and misplaced priorities seemed to have limited the fire department’s ability to act effectively. He questioned why emergency needs were neglected while leaders focused on initiatives disconnected from immediate safety concerns.

Witnessing Community Strength

Amid the devastation, Woods highlighted examples of extraordinary kindness. A former colleague offered his home as a refuge, providing keys, codes, and access despite being out of town. These gestures of generosity reminded Woods of the importance of relationships during times of need.

He urged others to cultivate genuine connections with their neighbors, pointing out that modern life often isolates people in their daily routines. In moments like these, knowing the people around you can be the difference between safety and tragedy.

The Larger Issues

Woods also expressed frustration with what he sees as systemic failures in California’s fire management and broader leadership. He criticized Governor Gavin Newsom and public officials for decisions he believes exacerbated the wildfire crisis. From understaffed departments to neglected infrastructures like empty reservoirs, he argued these failures directly contributed to the tragedy.

The actor also brought up the larger societal implications of leadership priorities that appear out of sync with public needs. He stressed the importance of competent leadership focused on practical solutions rather than political posturing.

Finding Humanity in Tragedy

While reflecting on the loss of his home, Woods dismissed personal attacks from individuals online, noting that their negativity held no weight in the face of real grief. Instead, he focused on the resilience and generosity of his neighbors, highlighting the strength found in community even amidst overwhelming destruction.

Through this tragedy, Woods reminded everyone of what truly matters — kindness, connection, and responsibility. As he aptly said, “Faith, family, and neighbors — those aren’t just words; they’re what hold us together.”

Conclusion

The Pacific Palisades fire has left scars far beyond the physical damage, exposing cracks in infrastructure and leadership, but also revealing the beauty of human connection during hardship. James Woods’ experience serves as a reminder to embrace the people in our communities and demand accountability from those tasked with protecting us. In times of crisis, neighbors, preparedness, and effective leadership are essential for survival and recovery. Let this be a call to not only reflect but to act and ensure tragedies like this are met with better solutions in the future.

Video summary generated with the assistance of AI.

Sarah Michelle Gellar was among the first to voice her discontent, highlighting the irony of evacuation orders amidst gridlocked traffic without any traffic control. “City of LA you want everyone to evacuate yet you have complete gridlock and not one traffic cop on the roads helping,” Gellar posted on her Instagram story, directly tagging the city’s and mayor’s official accounts.

This sentiment was echoed by other celebrities like Jillian Michaels and former “Dancing with the Stars” dancer Valentin Chmerkovskiy, who criticized the city’s preparedness and response. Chmerkovskiy pointed out the dire situation, stating, “5th largest economy on the planet. Firefighters didn’t have enough water pressure to do their jobs?!”

The fire’s impact was severe, with mandatory evacuations leading to scenes of abandoned cars on roads, further complicating the escape for residents. Actor Steve Guttenberg took matters into his own hands, helping move stranded vehicles to clear paths for emergency services, describing the scene as “a ghost town.”

James Woods, who lost his home in the fire, went beyond criticism to blame the disaster on what he described as political mismanagement by state and local leaders. He posted on X, “This isn’t climate change, this is due to liberal idiots like Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass. One doesn’t understand the first thing about fire management and the other can’t fill the water reservoirs.”

The community’s response has been one of shock and frustration, with celebrities like Chris Pratt calling for prayers for the firefighters and those unable to evacuate. The situation has spotlighted not only the immediate crisis but also broader issues about emergency preparedness and leadership in one of America’s largest cities.

The Palisades Fire underscores a critical moment for Los Angeles, where public and celebrity voices alike are demanding better from their elected officials in times of crisis.

Article generated from corporate media reports.

The deal encompasses all items discussed for the new contract, with both parties agreeing to continue operations under the current contract until a ratification vote can be scheduled. Details of the tentative agreement have not been disclosed publicly, as they are pending review and approval by ILA rank-and-file members and USMX members.

A key aspect of the agreement involves compromises on automation and semi-automation, areas that were central to past disputes. Sources indicate that while full automation has been ruled out, USMX retains the right to introduce technology deemed necessary for port modernization. In return, the ILA is guaranteed specific job roles linked to new equipment installations. This technology and labor integration will continue to be managed through a committee process composed of members from both the union and port management.

The joint statement from ILA and USMX highlighted the agreement’s significance: “We are pleased to announce that ILA and USMX have reached a tentative agreement on a new six-year ILA-USMX Master Contract, subject to ratification, thus averting any work stoppage on January 15, 2025. This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong.”

The statement further described the deal as a “win-win,” emphasizing that it supports American consumers and businesses by maintaining the U.S. as a central hub in global trade.

The agreement comes after previous labor tensions, including a strike in October 2024, which underscored the importance of labor peace in maintaining the efficiency of America’s supply chains. With this tentative deal, both sides aim to foster a stable environment for port operations moving forward.

Article generated from corporate media reports.